Adrian Grigore

Archive for the ‘LINQ’ Category

ASP.NET MVC Tip #1: Using Custom ViewModels with POST action methods

In ASP.NET MVC, LINQ on April 18, 2009 at 13:44

One of the top good practices for ASP.NET MVC is not to use the ViewData Dictionary, but to put your data in a strongly typed ViewModel instead. Many people seem to be using Linq to SQL entities as a ViewModel, because it’s a very comfortable approach. But what do you do if your view should contain data that is not included in any of your linq entities? Scott Gu’s chapter 1 preview of his upcoming ASP.NET MVC book recommends using a custom-shaped ViewModel for those cases. Read the rest of this entry »


Updated: Generic base class for LINQ2SQL data layers

In LINQ on February 26, 2009 at 16:23


It’s been a while since I posted the first version of my generic base class for LINQ2SQL data layers. The idea behind this class was to provide a quick and simple way to implement a repository with LINQ2SQL and therefore also a solid foundation for implementing your n-tier architecture data layer. If you missed the article, you can read more about the base class here.

The version I previously posted has worked fine for me, but it was still lacking a way to retrieve the ID and version attributes of saved entities. Due to a typo, it also did not work with entities that have more than one unique identity column. Thanks to Mike and Fabrizio for pointing out these limitations!

Version 0.2 available here fixes both of these issues:

Download RepositoryBase Demo Website

Download RepositoryBase Source Code Only

A generic base class for LINQ to SQL Data Layers

In LINQ on October 13, 2008 at 17:04

It’s hard not to fall in love with LINQ to SQL. It provides a type safe, powerful and extremely flexible way to implement data access in .NET applications. And it looks so easy to use in those nifty Microsoft evangelist presentations!

Unfortunately, after having a closer look at LINQ, I found that using LINQ in a multi-tier application can be quite a struggle. This article shows the typical pitfalls of implementing the data layer with LINQ to SQL and provides an simple, convenient and flexible way to circumvent most of them. Read the rest of this entry »

Linq entity Version property in databound controls

In LINQ on October 3, 2008 at 16:39

Since I am currently working on a multi-tier ASP.NET application, I frequently have to display Linq entities in data-driven controls such as GridView, DetailView, etc.

Most of my Linq entities have a version attribute to speed up database operations, and sometimes the entities are not only displayed, but also updated and saved back to the database. The first time I tried this, I got the following exception:

A first chance exception of type ‘System.Data.Linq.ChangeConflictException’ occurred in System.Data.Linq.dll

The reason for this is that I was not displaying the version anywhere in the Detailsview. When saving the entity back to the database, the ObjectDataSource created a new entity with default values for all properties that were not bound to any datafields in the DetailsView. So, the entity was re-instantiated with Version==null and when trying to update the database table for the Linq entity, Linq was looking for a row with a 0 version column.

I thought I might work around this by simply version property of the Linq entity to an invisible Column in the Detailsview. But that only gave me a new exception when trying to update the entity:

Sytem. InvalidOperationException: Cannot convert value of parameter ‘Version’ from ‘System.String’ to ‘System.Data.Linq.Binary’

The reason for this is that the Version attribute in Linq entities is of the type System.Data.Linq.Binary, which can be converted to a string, but not back from string to System.Data.Linq.Binary.

It took me quite a while to find at least some workaround for this problem. A working – but somewhat awkward – solution is to create a VersionString propery in each entity:

 public partial class Customer
 public string VersionString
 get { return _Version.TimestampToString(); }
 set { _Version = value.StringToTimestamp(); }

public static class DateTimeExtensions
 public static string TimestampToString(this Binary binary)
 return Convert.ToBase64String(binary.ToArray());
 public static Binary StringToTimestamp(this string s)
 return new Binary(Convert.FromBase64String(s));

Then I bound the VersionString to a hidden field in the DetailsView and the problem was gone. But this solution is not ideal since it requires the VersionString property to be defined for every single Linq entity type that uses a timestamp.

But wait, there’s a much easier way, I stumbled across this solution while playing around with Detailsview a few days ago: Simply add the Version propery to the DataKeyNames property of the DetailsGrid. For example, if your DataKeyNames propery is usually DataKeyNames=”ID”, write DataKeyNames=”ID,Version” instead.

This way the DetailsView serializes the Version property to it’s view state and deserializes it again when the entity has to be recreated. No need to fiddle with the VersionString approach above.